As organizations adopt hybrid and multi-cloud infrastructures, traditional backup strategies are no longer enough. Managed data protection services have become a practical way to ensure availability, scalability, and faster recovery.
Two commonly used services are Backup as a Service (BaaS) and Disaster Recovery as a Service (DRaaS). Although they are often mentioned together, they solve different problems.
BaaS provides cloud-based backup for data stored across on-premises systems, virtual machines, and cloud workloads. It is optimized for cost efficiency, long-term retention, and granular recovery. However, restoring large volumes of data or rebuilding an entire environment can take time.
DRaaS is focused on operational continuity. It replicates systems to a secondary environment so businesses can quickly switch over during outages or disasters. Because data remains in an uncompressed, ready-to-run state, recovery times are significantly shorter—but this also makes DRaaS more complex and expensive to operate.
In 2026, ransomware, compliance requirements, and distributed infrastructures are driving many organizations to adopt both services. BaaS is used for data preservation and compliance, while DRaaS ensures that critical applications remain available during major incidents.
The right choice depends on how much downtime a business can tolerate, how much data it can afford to lose, and how critical its applications are to daily operations.
👉 Read about the comprehensive breakdown of BaaS vs DRaaS, including real-world examples and selection criteria.
Top comments (0)